Controls / Logging and incident response
Privileged access events and logs from internet-facing servers are collected centrally, protected from change, and reviewed in a timely manner
What the applicant reports, the rules behind it in each jurisdiction, and the evidence an assessor asks for. In the applicant's words: collect admin and internet-facing server logs in one protected place, and review them.
In Australia
Maturity Level Two
Above the target when the underwriter picks Maturity Level One: shown as "above your target level", never a gap.
| Clause | The held text, and the evidence an assessor asks for |
|---|---|
| ISM-1509 Essential Eight, Maturity Level Two | Privileged access events are centrally logged. Required at Maturity Levels Two and Three of the Restrict administrative privileges mitigation strategy (Appendices B and C); ISM control ISM-1509 in ASD's Essential Eight to ISM mapping (December 2023). evidence an assessor asks for Central log platform showing privileged access events ingested; Sample of privileged sign-ins traced end to end |
| ISM-1650 Essential Eight, Maturity Level Two | Privileged user account and security group management events are centrally logged. Required at Maturity Levels Two and Three of the Restrict administrative privileges mitigation strategy (Appendices B and C); ISM control ISM-1650 in ASD's Essential Eight to ISM mapping (December 2023). evidence an assessor asks for Central logging of privileged account and security group changes; Alert rules for additions to administrative groups |
| ISM-1815 Essential Eight, Maturity Level Two | Event logs are protected from unauthorised modification and deletion. Required at Maturity Levels Two and Three of the Restrict administrative privileges mitigation strategy (Appendices B and C); ISM control ISM-1815 in ASD's Essential Eight to ISM mapping (December 2023). ASD lists this event logging and incident requirement under Restrict administrative privileges, so it is assessed for the events this strategy generates. evidence an assessor asks for Integrity protection and access restrictions on the store of privileged access event logs; List of accounts able to delete those logs |
| ISM-1906 Essential Eight, Maturity Level Two | Event logs from internet-facing servers are analysed in a timely manner to detect cyber security events. Required at Maturity Levels Two and Three of the Restrict administrative privileges mitigation strategy (Appendices B and C); ISM control ISM-1906 in ASD's Essential Eight to ISM mapping (December 2023). ASD lists this event logging and incident requirement under Restrict administrative privileges, so it is assessed for the events this strategy generates. evidence an assessor asks for Detection rules analysing privileged activity on internet-facing servers; Triage records with timestamps |
| ISM-1228 Essential Eight, Maturity Level Two | Cyber security events are analysed in a timely manner to identify cyber security incidents. Required at Maturity Levels Two and Three of the Restrict administrative privileges mitigation strategy (Appendices B and C); ISM control ISM-1228 in ASD's Essential Eight to ISM mapping (December 2023). ASD lists this event logging and incident requirement under Restrict administrative privileges, so it is assessed for the events this strategy generates. evidence an assessor asks for Analysis records of privileged access anomalies (new admin accounts, unusual hours) with outcomes; Timeliness metrics for privileged-activity alerts |
| ISM-1683 Essential Eight, Maturity Level Two | Successful and unsuccessful multi-factor authentication events are centrally logged. Required at Maturity Levels Two and Three of the Multi-factor authentication mitigation strategy (Appendices B and C); ISM control ISM-1683 in ASD's Essential Eight to ISM mapping (December 2023). evidence an assessor asks for Central log platform showing successful and unsuccessful multi-factor events ingested; Retention setting for authentication logs |
| ISM-1623 Essential Eight, Maturity Level Two | PowerShell module logging, script block logging and transcription events are centrally logged. Required at Maturity Levels Two and Three of the User application hardening mitigation strategy (Appendices B and C); ISM control ISM-1623 in ASD's Essential Eight to ISM mapping (December 2023). evidence an assessor asks for Central logging of the scripting shell's module logging, script block logging and transcription; Sample events in the log platform |
| ISM-1889 Essential Eight, Maturity Level Two | Command line process creation events are centrally logged. Required at Maturity Levels Two and Three of the User application hardening mitigation strategy (Appendices B and C); ISM control ISM-1889 in ASD's Essential Eight to ISM mapping (December 2023). evidence an assessor asks for Central logging of command line process creation events; Audit policy showing command line capture enabled |
PCI DSS v4.0.1, when it applies
Any business that stores, processes or transmits payment card data, in any of the three jurisdictions.
| Clause | The held text, and the evidence an assessor asks for |
|---|---|
| PCI DSS 10.2.1 PCI DSS v4.0.1 (add-on) | Audit logging enabled on all system components Audit logging must be switched on and actively recording for every system component and for cardholder data. Applies to all entities. The guidance explains that logs feed alerts and other monitoring tools such as IDS and SIEM and give a history trail for investigating incidents, and it advises storing only essential information in logs because log content is itself sensitive. Customized approach objective: every activity affecting system components and cardholder data leaves a record. evidence an assessor asks for Inventory of in-scope system components reconciled against log sources reporting to the SIEM; Audit policy or syslog configuration exports for sampled servers, network devices and databases; SIEM source health report showing last event received per device; Cloud provider logging configuration (for example trail or activity log settings) for in-scope accounts |
| PCI DSS 10.4.1 PCI DSS v4.0.1 (add-on) | Daily review of security-relevant logs Every day, at a minimum, the entity must review: all security events; the logs of each critical system component; the logs of each system component that stores, processes or transmits CHD and/or SAD; and the logs of each server and system component with a security function (such as authentication servers, IDS/IPS and network security controls). Applies to all entities. Objective under the customized approach: activity that may be suspicious or anomalous is found fast, keeping its impact low. evidence an assessor asks for Daily log review procedure naming the four log categories; SIEM dashboards or review tickets showing a review for every calendar day, including weekends and holidays; List of critical system components and security function systems covered by review; Reports or sign-offs from an outsourced SOC, if used; Interview records with analysts performing the review |
In the United States
| Clause | The held text, and the evidence an assessor asks for |
|---|---|
| CIS 8.2 CIS Controls v8.1 | Collect Audit Logs Gather audit logs, making sure logging has been switched on across enterprise assets as the audit log management process requires. evidence an assessor asks for Logging configuration per asset type enabled per the log management process; Log source coverage report against the asset inventory; Log collection standard specifying which assets must have audit logging switched on; Group policy, agent or cloud diagnostic settings enabling audit logging on each asset type; Log source silence alerts showing assets that stopped sending logs and the follow-up |
| CIS 8.11 CIS Controls v8.1 | Conduct Audit Log Reviews Review audit logs at least weekly to spot anomalies or unusual events that might signal a threat. The requirement's own words: at least weekly evidence an assessor asks for Weekly log review records with anomalies identified and follow-up; Reviewer sign-off or ticket evidence for each weekly review; Log review procedure defining weekly review scope, triage steps and escalation to incident response; SIEM dashboards or correlation rules used for the weekly review, with last-tuned dates; Incident or investigation tickets raised from weekly review findings |
| DE.CM-09 NIST CSF 2.0 | Computing hardware and software, runtime environments, and their data are monitored to find potentially adverse events evidence an assessor asks for EDR coverage report by asset class; File integrity monitoring baseline and drift alerts; Software inventory reconciliation with allowlist; Hardware tamper detection telemetry; Patch and configuration drift dashboard |
FTC Safeguards Rule, when it applies
Financial institutions under FTC jurisdiction, for example tax preparers, mortgage brokers and auto dealers that arrange financing.
| Clause | The held text, and the evidence an assessor asks for |
|---|---|
| 314.4(c)(8) FTC Safeguards Rule (add-on) | 314.4(c)(8) Monitoring and logging of authorised users Policies, procedures and controls are implemented to monitor and log the activity of authorised users and to detect unauthorised access to or use of, or tampering with, customer information by such users. evidence an assessor asks for User activity logging on systems holding customer information; Monitoring rules or reviews that detect misuse by authorised users |
HIPAA Security Rule, when it applies
HIPAA covered entities (health plans, health care clearinghouses, health care providers that transmit health information electronically) and their business associates.
| Clause | The held text, and the evidence an assessor asks for |
|---|---|
| 164.312(b) HIPAA Security Rule (add-on) | Audit Controls (Standard) Implement hardware, software, and procedural mechanisms that record and examine activity in information systems that contain or use ePHI. NIST recommends central log management aligned to SP 800-92. evidence an assessor asks for Logging standard; Central log management deployment; Log retention configuration; SIEM use case catalog |
23 NYCRR 500, when it applies
Entities licensed by the New York Department of Financial Services. Section 500.19 sets limited exemptions for smaller covered entities: whether one applies is a question for the business, and this page never decides it.
| Clause | The held text, and the evidence an assessor asks for |
|---|---|
| 500.6 23 NYCRR 500 (add-on) | Audit Trail Securely maintain systems that, based on Risk Assessment, are designed to reconstruct material financial transactions and include audit trails to detect and respond to cybersecurity events that have material likelihood of harming operations. Retain transaction records five years and audit trails three years. evidence an assessor asks for Logging and SIEM design document; List of in-scope financial systems and event logs; Five-year transaction record retention proof; Three-year audit trail retention proof; Log integrity protection controls (WORM, hashing); Log review and alerting procedures; Risk Assessment driving logging scope |
PCI DSS v4.0.1, when it applies
Any business that stores, processes or transmits payment card data, in any of the three jurisdictions.
| Clause | The held text, and the evidence an assessor asks for |
|---|---|
| PCI DSS 10.2.1 PCI DSS v4.0.1 (add-on) | Audit logging enabled on all system components Audit logging must be switched on and actively recording for every system component and for cardholder data. Applies to all entities. The guidance explains that logs feed alerts and other monitoring tools such as IDS and SIEM and give a history trail for investigating incidents, and it advises storing only essential information in logs because log content is itself sensitive. Customized approach objective: every activity affecting system components and cardholder data leaves a record. evidence an assessor asks for Inventory of in-scope system components reconciled against log sources reporting to the SIEM; Audit policy or syslog configuration exports for sampled servers, network devices and databases; SIEM source health report showing last event received per device; Cloud provider logging configuration (for example trail or activity log settings) for in-scope accounts |
| PCI DSS 10.4.1 PCI DSS v4.0.1 (add-on) | Daily review of security-relevant logs Every day, at a minimum, the entity must review: all security events; the logs of each critical system component; the logs of each system component that stores, processes or transmits CHD and/or SAD; and the logs of each server and system component with a security function (such as authentication servers, IDS/IPS and network security controls). Applies to all entities. Objective under the customized approach: activity that may be suspicious or anomalous is found fast, keeping its impact low. evidence an assessor asks for Daily log review procedure naming the four log categories; SIEM dashboards or review tickets showing a review for every calendar day, including weekends and holidays; List of critical system components and security function systems covered by review; Reports or sign-offs from an outsourced SOC, if used; Interview records with analysts performing the review |
In United Kingdom
No requirement in the core list for the United Kingdom covers this control; it is on the schedule as a condition beyond the core list.
PCI DSS v4.0.1, when it applies
Any business that stores, processes or transmits payment card data, in any of the three jurisdictions.
| Clause | The held text, and the evidence an assessor asks for |
|---|---|
| PCI DSS 10.2.1 PCI DSS v4.0.1 (add-on) | Audit logging enabled on all system components Audit logging must be switched on and actively recording for every system component and for cardholder data. Applies to all entities. The guidance explains that logs feed alerts and other monitoring tools such as IDS and SIEM and give a history trail for investigating incidents, and it advises storing only essential information in logs because log content is itself sensitive. Customized approach objective: every activity affecting system components and cardholder data leaves a record. evidence an assessor asks for Inventory of in-scope system components reconciled against log sources reporting to the SIEM; Audit policy or syslog configuration exports for sampled servers, network devices and databases; SIEM source health report showing last event received per device; Cloud provider logging configuration (for example trail or activity log settings) for in-scope accounts |
| PCI DSS 10.4.1 PCI DSS v4.0.1 (add-on) | Daily review of security-relevant logs Every day, at a minimum, the entity must review: all security events; the logs of each critical system component; the logs of each system component that stores, processes or transmits CHD and/or SAD; and the logs of each server and system component with a security function (such as authentication servers, IDS/IPS and network security controls). Applies to all entities. Objective under the customized approach: activity that may be suspicious or anomalous is found fast, keeping its impact low. evidence an assessor asks for Daily log review procedure naming the four log categories; SIEM dashboards or review tickets showing a review for every calendar day, including weekends and holidays; List of critical system components and security function systems covered by review; Reports or sign-offs from an outsourced SOC, if used; Interview records with analysts performing the review |
Also cited: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A
A lens in any jurisdiction, never a gap on its own.
| Clause | The held text, and the evidence an assessor asks for |
|---|---|
| A.8.15 ISO/IEC 27001:2022 (lens) | Logging Logs recording activity, exceptions, faults and other events of interest are to be generated, kept, protected and analysed. Purpose (stated in ISO/IEC 27002:2022): records events, generates evidence, protects log integrity, identifies security events and supports investigations. As an Annex A reference control, it is compared with the controls determined in risk treatment (6.1.3 c) and recorded in the Statement of Applicability as included or excluded, with the justification and implementation status (6.1.3 d); implementation guidance is ISO/IEC 27002:2022 8.15. evidence an assessor asks for Statement of Applicability entry for control A.8.15, showing inclusion or justified exclusion, implementation status and the risks it treats; The topic-specific logging policy defining purposes, events to be logged, fields captured, retention and protection; Log source inventory showing which systems send which event types to central logging or SIEM; Configuration evidence that logs are tamper-protected (append-only storage, hashing, restricted deletion) and that administrators cannot erase their own activity; SIEM correlation rules, use cases and alert tuning records, and evidence of regular log review |
| A.8.16 ISO/IEC 27001:2022 (lens) | Monitoring activities Networks, systems and applications are to be monitored for anomalous behaviour, with appropriate steps taken to evaluate possible information security incidents. Purpose (stated in ISO/IEC 27002:2022): spots abnormal behaviour and possible security incidents. As an Annex A reference control, it is compared with the controls determined in risk treatment (6.1.3 c) and recorded in the Statement of Applicability as included or excluded, with the justification and implementation status (6.1.3 d); implementation guidance is ISO/IEC 27002:2022 8.16. evidence an assessor asks for Statement of Applicability entry for control A.8.16, showing inclusion or justified exclusion, implementation status and the risks it treats; A documented monitoring scope covering network traffic, system access, configuration files, security tool logs, code integrity and resource use, with retention periods; Baselines of normal behaviour for systems and user groups, and the detection rules built on them; Alerting configuration with thresholds and evidence of tuning to reduce false positives; Monitoring team rota or SOC arrangement with trained staff and redundant alert channels |
Questions
- What does the applicant report for this control?
- Whether it is in place, partly in place, not in place or not sure. Partly, not in place and not sure are gaps; not sure reads as a question.
- When is it due on the 90-day schedule?
- Day 60 by the default rule for a core line, day 90 when it is beyond the core list for the jurisdiction or marked not sure. The underwriter or broker can move it.
- Does this page check the control?
- No. The applicant reports a closure with a date and a note; the schedule records it as reported and never checks it.